The evaluation of my contents 







What I think went well in my contents page was the persistence  of the fonts , because I know in most mature magazines the font is persistence, also what went really well was the layout scheme of the images, want I wanted to perceive to the audience was to give them a quick but brief preview of what the magazine had to offer.

What  could of gone better was if  I concentrated on the colour scheme, because in the magazine the bright yellow makes the contents  look very tacky, immature and neat so this doesn't meet the purpose because the contents page come across too bold and strong  due  to the  bright pop colour of yellow. What I would redo is chose calm and compose colour like a the colour of  the top of my model (a creamy colour) doing that my contents page would relate to the pupil and the colour  scheme  of the contents page would have met its purpose. Another thing I could of done is manage the sizing of the fonts, my reasoning for why I did  was because I wanted to separate the information without using squares because I wanted to be creative but presently looking at my contents page it looks really childish and messy

I agree 100% with the criticism on my contents page I really didn't  consider the eye site or viewing of the readers .

The photography used in the contents page relates to the content of the whole magazine, the photography I took consists of pupils from Leyton sixth form making use of the equipment and learning  facilities. The reason to why chose to take pictures like this is becuase i wanted to give the readers an insight of what the magazine had to offer which a day in a life of an LSC  student.